Why Most Communication Training Misses the Point (And What Actually Works)

Connect with us: SB Nation | Doodle or Die | Medium | Pexels | Elephantjournal

Three weeks ago, I watched a senior manager spend forty-five minutes explaining to his team why they needed to "leverage synergistic communication pathways to optimise stakeholder engagement." By the end of it, half the room was checking their phones and the other half looked like they were planning their resignation letters.

This is exactly what's wrong with most workplace communication training today.

I've been running communication workshops for Australian businesses since 2008, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that 80% of what passes for "professional communication training" is complete rubbish. We're teaching people to sound like corporate robots instead of actual human beings who need to get things done.

The Problem With "Professional" Communication

Let me be brutally honest here. The biggest communication problem in Australian workplaces isn't that people don't know how to write emails or conduct meetings. It's that we've created this bizarre culture where sounding "professional" means stripping every ounce of personality and clarity from our communication.

I've seen perfectly intelligent tradies suddenly start talking like they've swallowed a thesaurus the moment they step into a corporate environment. It's painful to watch.

The real issue? Most communication training courses focus on format instead of connection. They teach you templates and buzzwords when what you actually need is confidence and clarity.

What Actually Drives Results

Here's something that might ruffle a few feathers: the best communicators I know break half the "rules" they teach in traditional business communication courses.

They use contractions. They start sentences with "And" or "But." They actually express opinions instead of hiding behind corporate-speak. And guess what? They get promoted faster, build stronger relationships, and achieve better outcomes than their template-following colleagues.

Take Richard Branson, for instance. The man built a business empire by communicating like a human being rather than a press release. His emails read like conversations with a mate, not legal documents.

Now I'm not saying you should throw professionalism out the window. But there's a massive difference between being professional and being a communication zombie.

The Three Things That Actually Matter

After fifteen years of watching what works and what doesn't, I've identified three core elements that separate effective workplace communicators from the rest:

Directness Over Diplomacy This one always gets pushback from HR departments, but hear me out. The most effective leaders I work with say what they mean. They don't bury important information in layers of diplomatic padding. When there's a problem, they address it. When they need something, they ask for it clearly.

I'm not talking about being rude or aggressive. I'm talking about respecting people enough to be straight with them instead of making them decode your messages like they're solving a bloody crossword puzzle.

Context Over Compliance Standard communication training loves rules. "Always use this greeting." "Never start with this phrase." "Include these seven elements in every proposal."

Complete nonsense.

The best communicators adapt their style to their audience and situation. They know when to be formal and when to be casual. They understand that a text message to their team lead requires different language than a presentation to the board.

Consistency Over Perfection Here's where most people get it wrong. They think good communication means never making mistakes or always having the perfect word choice. Actually, it means showing up consistently with clear, honest communication even when you're having an off day.

I once worked with a site manager who had terrible grammar but was the most effective communicator on his team. Why? Because he was consistent, direct, and genuinely cared about getting his message across. His team always knew exactly where they stood and what was expected.

The Australian Advantage (That We're Throwing Away)

We Australians have a natural communication advantage that we're systematically training out of our workforce. We're direct, we cut through the BS, and we value straight talk. These are incredible strengths in a business environment.

But somewhere along the way, we decided that to be "professional," we needed to sound like we graduated from an American business school. We started replacing "mate" with "stakeholder" and "problem" with "challenge."

The result? We've created workplaces full of people who can write impressive-sounding emails but can't have a simple, honest conversation about what's actually happening.

I was working with a mining company in Perth last year where the safety briefings had become so loaded with corporate jargon that the guys on the ground had stopped listening. We stripped it back to plain English, and incident reports dropped by 30% in three months. Not because the safety procedures changed, but because people finally understood what was being communicated.

What Nobody Tells You About Email Communication

Since we're being honest here, let's talk about email. Most email communication training focuses on structure and etiquette. They'll teach you about subject lines and professional signatures until you're blue in the face.

What they won't tell you is that the most important part of any email is the first sentence. If you can't grab someone's attention in those first fifteen words, the rest of your beautifully formatted message doesn't matter.

I've tested this with hundreds of managers. The emails that get responses and action are the ones that start with something like "We've got a problem with the Johnson account" or "I need your decision on this by Friday." Not "I hope this email finds you well" or "I am writing to inform you that..."

The Meeting Communication Crisis

Don't get me started on meetings. Actually, do get me started, because this is where communication training really falls apart.

We train people to run meetings like they're conducting a symphony orchestra. Formal agendas, structured discussions, careful minute-taking. Meanwhile, the most productive meetings I attend feel more like focused conversations between people who respect each other's time.

The problem isn't that people don't know meeting etiquette. The problem is that most meetings shouldn't be meetings at all. They should be phone calls, emails, or quick conversations at someone's desk.

But because we've made "meeting management" this complex skill that requires training, people think every discussion needs a formal meeting structure. It's madness.

The Generational Communication Myth

Here's another unpopular opinion: the idea that different generations can't communicate effectively at work is largely manufactured nonsense.

Yes, younger workers might prefer Slack to email. Yes, older workers might be more comfortable with phone calls. But the fundamentals of clear, respectful communication haven't changed.

The real issue isn't generational—it's that we've overcomplicated workplace communication to the point where nobody feels confident just talking to each other like normal human beings.

I've watched 22-year-old apprentices explain complex technical problems to 55-year-old managers with perfect clarity. I've seen experienced executives connect instantly with graduate trainees. The magic ingredient isn't special cross-generational communication techniques—it's treating each other with basic respect and speaking plainly.

What Works in the Real World

So what does effective workplace communication training actually look like? Based on what I've seen work across industries from construction to finance, here's what matters:

Practice Real Conversations Stop role-playing perfect scenarios and start practising the messy, complicated conversations that actually happen at work. How do you tell someone their performance is slipping? How do you push back on an unrealistic deadline? How do you deliver bad news to a client?

These aren't questions you can answer with templates and scripts. They require practice, feedback, and the confidence to be human in professional situations.

Focus on Listening (Actually) Every communication course claims to teach listening skills. Most of them are rubbish. Real listening isn't about maintaining eye contact and nodding at appropriate intervals. It's about genuinely trying to understand what the other person needs, wants, or is concerned about.

The best managers I know ask more questions than they answer. They listen for what's not being said as much as what is. And they create environments where people feel safe being honest about problems before they become crises.

Embrace Productive Conflict This might be the most controversial thing I'll say, but avoiding conflict is killing workplace communication. When we train people to be diplomatic and non-confrontational about everything, we create environments where real issues never get addressed.

Good communication training should teach people how to disagree professionally, how to push back on bad ideas, and how to have difficult conversations without damaging relationships. These are skills that actually matter in the real world.

The ROI Nobody Talks About

Here's what companies don't realise about communication training: the return on investment isn't in smoother meetings or more polished presentations. It's in the problems that don't escalate, the misunderstandings that don't happen, and the trust that builds when people feel heard and understood.

I worked with a retail chain where staff turnover was through the roof. Exit interviews kept mentioning "communication issues" with management. We focused on training managers to have regular, honest conversations with their teams—not formal performance reviews, just regular check-ins where people could speak openly about what was and wasn't working.

Turnover dropped by 40% in six months. Not because we changed policies or increased pay, but because people felt like their managers actually gave a damn about their concerns.

The Bottom Line

Most workplace communication training is solving the wrong problem. We're teaching people to sound professional when we should be teaching them to be clear, honest, and human.

Stop trying to eliminate your personality from your professional communication. Stop hiding behind corporate jargon when plain English will do. And for the love of all that's holy, stop making every interaction so formal that people are afraid to just have a normal conversation.

The best professional development training I've ever delivered focused on giving people permission to communicate like themselves—just better versions of themselves.

Your organisation doesn't need a team of communication robots. It needs people who can think clearly, speak honestly, and listen genuinely. Everything else is just window dressing.

And if that's not professional enough for some people, well, they're probably part of the problem.

---

Want to improve communication in your workplace? Stop overthinking it and start focusing on what actually matters: clarity, honesty, and respect. The rest will sort itself out.